Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

part ranking

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "part ranking" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the ranking or position of a specific part within a larger system or set. Example: "In the competition, the part ranking of each entry will determine the overall winners."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

At organ level resolution, "Organism Part" ranked 11th[ 30].

To further study the different properties of external and internal regions, we analyzed the variance in GC-content and correlations between CDS part ranks along genes.

To answer this question, we removed intron sequences, concatenated CDS parts of each genes keeping track of CDS part ranks, and computed GC-content per nt position according to distance from the translation start of the gene.

He is a fairly decent runner even in these parts, ranked in the all-time top 10 in the marathon with a time of 2hr4min.

This reflects both the importance of Healthcare to the overall US economy and the research intensive nature of this industry (only the category of Computers and electronic parts ranked higher in spending).

Science

Plosone

Why? 1. IGNORANCE: For the most part, rank-and-file cops aren't trained scientists or policy experts.

News & Media

Huffington Post

In the second part, rank-based enrichment statistics were applied to compute pairwise correlation scores between all signatures (Figures 2 and 3) followed by a meta-analysis to compute individual signature-ontology concept correlation scores (Figure 4).

Science

Plosone

GC-content per nt positions along the genes was compared either by summing over all the genes independently of CDS part rank or by subsetting over nt positions according to CDS part rank.

In part, rank consistency of a family or order depended on its values versus the mean for all 88 genera; families with very high or very low frequencies were more likely to exhibit a consistent ranking among the sampled genera.

Large differences being observed between introns and coding regions, to further study the effect of intron presence in coding regions we removed intron sequences and concatenated CDS parts, keeping information on CDS part rank.

In the second part, rank-based enrichment statistics were applied to compute pairwise correlation scores between all signatures followed by a meta-analysis to compute individual signature-ontology concept correlation scores.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "part ranking", ensure the context clearly defines the criteria used for ranking. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that the audience inherently understands the ranking criteria. Explicitly state the factors influencing the "part ranking" to prevent misinterpretations.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

77%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "part ranking" functions as a noun phrase that refers to the act or process of assigning a rank or order to different parts of a whole based on specific criteria. The phrase is deemed correct and usable in written English by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "part ranking" is a valid phrase that describes the process of assigning ranks to different parts within a system, often based on pre-defined criteria. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. While examples are limited, the contexts span science, news, and formal business settings. The term's effectiveness hinges on clearly defining the ranking criteria to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "component ranking" or "element prioritization" may offer more precise nuances depending on the specific application. Although the source quality is high, its relatively low frequency contributes to a moderate expert rating.

FAQs

How can I use "part ranking" effectively in a technical document?

To effectively use "part ranking", define the evaluation criteria clearly. For instance, specify if the ranking is based on cost, efficiency, or performance metrics. Provide a rationale for each "component ranking".

What are some alternatives to "part ranking"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "component ranking", "element prioritization", or "segment classification". Each alternative emphasizes a different aspect of the ranking process.

Is "part ranking" suitable for formal writing?

Yes, "part ranking" is suitable for formal writing, especially in technical or analytical contexts. However, ensure the term is well-defined and the ranking process is transparent. If needed, adapt it to "factor rating" for broader understanding.

How does "part ranking" differ from "item sorting"?

"Part ranking" typically involves a more structured evaluation process with specific criteria, whereas "item sorting" is a general term for arranging items in a particular order. "Part ranking" often implies a hierarchical arrangement based on performance or importance, unlike simple item sorting.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

77%

Authority and reliability

3.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: