Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
Immigration has become part of this argument.
"The problem," he wrote, "is that every part of this argument is based on a fallacy".
He writes, "every part of this argument is based on a fallacy".
The problem is that every part of this argument is based on a fallacy.
The other part of this argument is the assertion that early starters are actually deterred from introducing on a broad front the new technology they themselves have developed.
Also, since they are not on American soil, they cannot challenge their detention in American courts.The Roberts court struck down part of this argument in 2006, ruling that the detainees must have some way of contesting their detention.
Similar(40)
Neuroeconomics potentially challenges both parts of this argument.
The historical parts of this argument are fresh and persuasive, but the technological ones are slightly less so.
All three parts of this argument are unconvincing — and the bottom-line policy implication, "do little, be happy," is downright dangerous.
And if an Iraqi war should come, say the doubters, its one sure result will be to make millions of Muslims hate America the more, driving some of them to arms.Yes, do two things at onceA few parts of this argument need to be taken seriously.
There are parts of this argument that I categorically reject, and which you should as well.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com