Sentence examples for part of relation from inspiring English sources

Rather, complex universals (hence also complex facts of which they are constituents) enjoy a "non-mereological mode of composition" (1997, 119 123) that, in particular, allows for a richer conception of their structure.[41] (An assumption of our simplified account here will be that both the proper part of relation and the constituency relation are well-founded.

The logical-semantic relations are the synonymy (in the case of elements that are equal); antynomy (opposite, but not bidirectional relations); hyponymy/hypernymy (IS-A hierarchy), mereonomy (which corresponds to the "is part of" relation and defines the cases in which we find the correspondence: components/member/particle).

This subprocess is associated with RNA-Seq experimental process through a part of relation, since it only occurs as part of a RNA-Seq experimental process.

The part of relation and its inverse (has part) are presented as a UML shared aggregation stereotyped as part of and has part, respectively.

Let us first sharpen our understanding of the part-of relation.

Thus, the referring expression generator used only one relation, namely the "part-of" relation.

The principles for the (proper) part-of relation imply that complexes with the same parts are identical.

The supplementation principle together with the uncontroversial axioms for the (proper) part-of relation also implies the more controversial thesis that complex objects with the same parts are identical (see Mereology, 3.2).

Independently of his counterpart theory, Lewis's definition of a possible object has some peculiar consequences, given that existence in general is understood as bearing of the part-of relation to the whole that constitutes the domain of discourse.

A further plausible principle for the part-of relation is the supplementation principle: if x is part of y, there is an object z that is part of y and that does overlap, that is, have a part in common, with x.

We use the part-of relation to assert, as axioms, that model components must be part of a model, that physical objects can only have physical objects as part and that processes can only have other processes as part.