Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Parents were randomised to start with the PPCBR or non-PPCBR intervention using a computer-generated randomisation protocol.
In another US study, parents were randomised to receive educational materials on either the use of antibiotics or injury prevention [ 41].
Parents were randomised to receive the Wide Awake Parenting program (intervention groups) or usual care (control group) offered by health services.
Parents were randomised to receive feedback (phase 1, screening) delivered using a BPC (n=540) or MI approach (n=553) using random block lengths (Stata V.12.0, StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA) after stratifying for practice, with sealed, opaque envelopes.
37 Another study where parents were randomised to receive written materials on either antibiotic use or injury prevention found no reduction in antibiotic use in the families who received the intervention.
The parents gave informed consent to take part in the study; however, due to the requirement to print the models in advance of the clinic visit, parents were randomised before they had been consented.
Similar(54)
If parents are randomised to SSTP, the intervention will start within four weeks of administering the screening questionnaire.
Although patients were randomised into the parent trial, we used a convenience sample of the first 29 patients who agreed to be videotaped (31 were asked).
Ninety patients were randomised into two treatment groups.
Sixty-three patients were randomised to receive sativex and 62 placebo.
Thirty patients were randomised.
Related(20)
patients were randomised
infants were randomised
partners were randomised
participants were randomised
residents were randomised
pairs were randomised
statements were randomised
consent were randomised
parents were framed
parents were mismatched
parents were jailed
parents were dismayed
parents were thrilled
parents were worried
parents were concerned
parents were involved
parents were murdered
parents were outraged
parents were distressed
parents were mortified
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com