Sentence examples for parameters were poor from inspiring English sources

ORP and Al have been removed from the multivariate statistical analysis, because the normality improvements of these two parameters were poor after the log-transformation.

Preoperative physical examination findings and included laboratory parameters were poor predictors of increased cTnI levels.

Subjects in group 1 did not perform well on the WSC because their gait parameters were poor, whereas subjects in group 2 showed better walking performance on the WSC because their gait parameters were significantly better.

There were 2 deaths in this group and none in the elective caesarean section group and all fetal parameters were poorer: more Apgar<7 at 5 min (RR: relative risk=3.05; 1.03–9.05), arterial pH<7.15 (RR=1.64; 1.11–2.43), intubations (RR=7.35; 2.10–25.6), neurological disorders, trauma (RR=4.24; 1.66–10.8), transfer to intensive care units (RR=3.23; 1.57–6.64).

The performance of both PCP and CTD-based models on threshold dependent, as well as on threshold independent parameters were poorer than dipeptide-based models.

Such a pattern was not observed in A. woodmaniorum, with population parameters being poor predictors of pollen immigration rates.

However, commonly used clinical and pathological parameters are poor predictors of response to this type of therapy.

Implementation of the QPL approach using SAS code available from http://dir.niehs.nih.gov/dirbb/weinbergfiles/qpl.htm (data not shown) indicates that estimation of these two inestimable α′12 and a120 parameters is poor, with very large estimates and confidence intervals, although this does not appear to adversely affect estimation of the six genuinely estimable parameters.

Although vertical cup-to-disc ratio is a well-recognized parameter in the prediction of OAG risk, the accuracy of prediction based solely on this parameter is poor owing to disc appearance in preclinical and early glaucomatous damage overlapping with the normal range of this trait.

However, the chemosensor fabrication procedure was not optimized with respect to temporal stability and reversibility, as both these parameters were very poor.

Applying O2PLS-DA to the three groups, the LD group was found to be separate from the two other groups, although the model parameters were relatively poor (R(X) = 36.1%; R(Y) = 25.3%; Q = 19.5%; data not shown).