The percentages within the results section are based on codes in each theme for the response paragraph unit of analysis.
Second, in the last paragraph of "Data analysis," the statement about the two concentration measures has been corrected to "the two concentration measures (e.g., blood and brain) did not decline in parallel with time".
That content tends to be a really dumb listicle, or a one sentence piece of pure and unadulterated banality, or, if you are really lucky, a paragraph or two of analysis that's either so conventional as to appear slam-dunk, or so witless that it's completely laughable and wrong.
It is indicated in the text (the last paragraph of the Theoretical Analysis section) that "function f g, J) is independent of N" but parameter g, as defined in the text, depends on N. Can you clarify this point?
As stated in the aforementioned paragraph, an analysis of the satisfaction of crosslinks in the best scoring cluster shows that whereas intra-modular Mediator crosslinks (residue-residue distances within modules) are 95% satisfied in this cluster, inter-modular crosslinks (residue-residue distances between modules) are only 10% satisfied.
A particularly interested reader can calculate using Additional file 1. Tenth paragraph: The analysis of TIRs should also include analysis of internal IRs, if any, in the sequences.
Some findings with p < 0.05, although not adhering to our strict significance criteria of the logistic regression analysis, may nevertheless indicate relevant correlations: Items #3 and #5 are also significant (sensitive communication, p = 0.003) or close to significant (sufficient information, p = 0.02) in the respective univariate tests (see paragraph Quantitative analysis of donor responses).
We now comment on this finding within the Results section, and the new paragraph begins "Analysis of blood samples collected from secondary recipients at 10 weeks revealed a marked clonal advantage for GFP+/Mybl2-RNAi cells transplanted from each of the four mice with primary disease".
