However, even when there is a good story to tell, the author does not tell it: taxol (paclitaxel), for example (page 212, last paragraph), is discussed briefly as follows: 'Also there is Taxol, derived from the bark of the Pacific yew, an evergreen tree or shrub, notably of the Pacific Northwest.
The examples presented in the following paragraphs are discussed with the specific aim of showing how different representations affect the outcome of the analysis.
In order to connect to other parts of the network being discussed in following paragraph, (varvec{M}^{em}_{t}) should be flattened to a vector by a flattening layer, then the final representation of categorical variables can be defined as: begin{aligned} varvec{m}^{em}_{t} = flatten varvec{M}^{em}_{t}) end{aligned} (5 where (varvec{m}^{em}_{t}) is a vector of (mathbb {R}^{4N_{em}}).
We limited counting 'any mention of costs' to once per paragraph when costs were discussed without numeric values.
The observers might have been some other investigators, though the affiant does not say so; yet in the two paragraphs next to be discussed the observers are prominently identified as investigators.
In the next paragraphs the subfamilies are discussed in detail.
Key aspects are described in the following paragraphs and will be discussed in the next section.
- why one has to suppose it - can this again be evaluated by comparing species tree and gene tree? the next paragraphs: interesting differences are discussed, but no specific evolutionary scenarios are proposed viz. the timing of the events.
In the next paragraph he's discussing Heinrich Böll ("whose Nobel Prize was in my opinion otherwise deserved").
These behavioral differences between male and female Darters are discussed in paragraph six of Results and Discussion, but clearly further work is needed to determine the functional significance, if any, of darting in males.
These points are discussed in the Discussion section (paragraph three) in the revised manuscript.
