The phrase "paragraph at the bottom" is correct and usable in written English
You can use it to refer to the last paragraph of a written passage or document. For example: "Please read the paragraph at the bottom for further information on the topic."
It's about a little flash, glimpsed for half a paragraph at the bottom of a left-hand page, that fills you with something almost like knowing.
And a press release can trumpet the pro forma numbers while burying GAAP in a paragraph at the bottom.
No announcement was made other than a blast e-mail to product marketers and the addition of a paragraph at the bottom of this page describing how you can advertise with Amazon.
By contrast, the Telegraph gave it only six paragraphs at the bottom of page 2 on Tuesday and seven paragraphs in the business pages on Wednesday.
The major artwork on Page A1 was from Syria, and the only mention of the hearing on Libya came in a one-paragraph summary at the bottom, leading readers to a well-displayed story on Page A3.
Of course after his paragraph of kidding around, he notes at the bottom of his email that: "However, what we can say is that it's not a product.
Even in the New York Times article that spent dozens of paragraphs speculating about Russian involvement concluded at the bottom: "It may take months, or years, to figure out the motives of those who stole the emails, and more important, whether they were being commanded by Russian authorities, and specifically by Putin".
Look down at the bottom of this paragraph.
The original story was corrected later (you just can't make this stuff up, folks!) by striking out the term "half-joking" and adding at the bottom of the paragraph: "The somebody in question wanted to clarify that he is not at all joking, not even halfway, and is indeed fully rooting for Hillary Clinton".
I almost missed your invite, though, because you put it at the bottom of four paragraphs about your tomato plants and what's going on with your friend Ruth — all, of course, in an e-mail thread with the subject "Thanksgiving 2013" that you keep responding to for some reason.
Most public figures of his stature, and even most economists, would have offered at least a perfunctory paragraph about how his economic thinking was aimed at helping those at the bottom of the social ladder – whether true or not.
