The phrase "paradoxical consequences" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
You can use "paradoxical consequences" to describe a situation where the outcome or result is unexpected or contradictory to what is expected or intended. Example: The government's new policy to promote eco-tourism had paradoxical consequences, as it unintentionally led to an increase in pollution due to a surge in tourist activity.
Also, the idea seems to have some paradoxical consequences.
Coe and Scocca are both interested in the same phenomenon: how modern cultural forms turn out to have unanticipated — and paradoxical — consequences.
Generations of students and philosophers have struggled with the paradoxical consequences of Einstein's deceptively simple notion, which underlies all of modern physics and technology, wrestling with clocks that speed up and slow down, yardsticks that contract and expand and bad jokes using the word "relative".
If it comes to that, there are several counter-examples, and/or paradoxical consequences to likelihood principle.
The denial of real relations in God also has paradoxical consequences for the concept of divine goodness.
But, in contrast to blue, this counterpart could exist, i.e., it is a possible nonexistent object.[17] Unfortunately, however, MOTo has a number of paradoxical consequences.
Dr. Wesch, for one, says he worries that the rise of secondary orality may have a paradoxical consequence: "It may be gobbling up what's left of our real oral culture".
One paradoxical consequence of this "last-place aversion" is that some poor people may be vociferously opposed to the kinds of policies that would actually raise their own income a bit but that might also push those who are poorer than them into comparable or higher positions.
But the new legislative setting could lead to the paradoxical consequence of impeding the functioning by challenging the existence and/or creation of POs.
The somewhat paradoxical consequence is that one can assert a statement of the form "[aRb] exists" without thereby manifesting any ontological commitment to the complex [aRb] (cf. EPB, 121).
To avoid the paradoxical consequence that some artworks lack authors, the concepts of authorship and artifactuality must be interpreted in this context in such a way that the choice of an object for "presentation to the artworld public" is sufficient to make the presenter the author of the object qua work of art, that is, as an object of aesthetic appreciation.
