Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
papers were held
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "papers were held" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where documents or papers are being retained or kept for a certain purpose, such as in legal or administrative situations. Example: "Due to the ongoing investigation, the papers were held by the authorities for further review."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
After Southern's death, the papers were held by his estate, with Nile Southern as the executor.
News & Media
The papers were held by Dechert – the US law firm hired by ENRC to run an internal investigation into a range of allegations.
News & Media
Noll found that the case had actually been handled by another analyst and disciple, JJ Honegger, whose papers were held by the library.
News & Media
Writing Byron, the travel – to Italy, to Greece, and to all the archives where relevant papers were held – was particularly exhausting: after the publication of Childe Harold, the poet was such a celebrity that "every tiny little note he wrote was kept".
News & Media
Filter papers were held outside a mesh sphere that allowed full nasal contact with the test stimuli, or inside the mesh sphere for pre-exposure to airborne volatiles only, following the procedure in [ 17].
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
54 human-written examples
For officials of the National Archives, which had worked with Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, to get hold of the papers since Hollinger tried to sell them at Christie's in 2005, the prospect of the papers' being held hostage, or even sold off, as a result of bankruptcy proceedings has prompted dismay.
News & Media
His papers are held by the Claremont Colleges Honnold-Mudd Library Special Collectionss.
Wiki
His papers are held at the Churchill Archives Centre in Cambridge, and are accessible to the public.
Wiki
His papers are held in the Australian War Memorial, where his field marshal's baton is on display.
Wiki
The Gloria Steinem Papers are held in the Sophia Smith Collection at Smith College, under collection number MS 237.
Wiki
A sizeable collection of ethnographic information and objects that Mohun collected in Africa is now held in the collection of the Smithsonian Museum and many of his papers are held by the Belgian Royal Museum for Central Africa and the US National Archives and Records Administration.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "papers were held", ensure the context clearly indicates who held the papers and for what reason. This clarifies the purpose of retention and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "papers was held". The subject "papers" is plural, so the verb "were" is necessary for correct grammar. Double-check subject-verb agreement to maintain clarity.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "papers were held" functions primarily as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject (papers) was the recipient of the action (held). This construction is commonly used to describe the state of documents being retained by an entity or individual. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness and usability of this phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Science
20%
Wiki
20%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
8%
Formal & Business
7%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "papers were held" is a grammatically sound passive construction used to denote the retention of documents. As determined by Ludwig AI, its usage is valid and applicable across various contexts, although not exceptionally common. The phrase often surfaces in news, scientific, and general contexts, assuming a neutral and professional register. For those seeking alternatives, phrases such as "documents were retained" or "records were kept" provide semantically similar options. Correct usage involves ensuring subject-verb agreement (avoiding "papers was held") and clearly indicating the holder and reason for retention.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
documents were retained
Focuses on the act of keeping documents, often for a specific reason.
records were kept
Emphasizes the act of maintaining a collection of records.
files were maintained
Similar to 'records were kept' but often implies a more organized system.
documents were under custody
Highlights the legal or official control of the documents.
materials were archived
Suggests a systematic preservation of materials for historical or future use.
documents were in safekeeping
Emphasizes the secure storage of the documents.
records were under management
Implies that the records are being actively managed or controlled.
files were in possession
Indicates ownership or control of the files.
documents were secured
Stresses the protection and safety of the documents.
records were preserved
Focuses on maintaining the integrity and condition of the records over time.
FAQs
How can I use "papers were held" in a sentence?
You can use "papers were held" to indicate that documents were kept or retained for a specific purpose. For example, "The "papers were held as evidence" in the trial".
What are some alternatives to the phrase "papers were held"?
Alternatives include phrases like "documents were retained", "records were kept", or "files were maintained", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it grammatically correct to say "papers was held" instead of "papers were held"?
No, "papers was held" is grammatically incorrect. The subject "papers" is plural, so the correct verb form is "were". Therefore, the correct phrase is "papers were held".
What is the difference between saying "the papers are being held" and "the papers were held"?
"The papers are being held" indicates a present action that is ongoing, whereas "the papers were held" indicates an action that occurred in the past and is now completed. For example, "The "papers are being held for review"" versus "The "papers were held for safekeeping" last year".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested