Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Most challenging were the frequent small-group meetings where scientific papers were discussed.
Therefore, 26 papers were discussed.
A number of relevant papers were discussed at the Forum.
From this, 10 papers were discussed between the two reviewers.
Doubtful papers were discussed with a third reviewer.
In case of doubt the papers were discussed with a second author (JH) until agreement was reached.
Similar(50)
Both these papers are discussed in the latest analysis.
Second, those notes will be handy later on, when papers are discussed and authors sumbit responses, rebuttals, or revisions.
Inconsistent scoring can affect which papers are discussed in program committee meetings and which papers are advocated for, or how strongly.
What's more, there is clearly a democratic deficit when even elected members of Parliament don't have access to papers being discussed, and when the proposals include a supra-national and unaccountable judicial system to arbitrate on trade policy.
Some of the prominent papers are discussed below.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com