Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Finally, the full text of 31 papers was reviewed.
With the inclusion criteria mentioned above, the full-text version of 106 papers was reviewed.
The full text version of 84 papers was reviewed and 67 studies were removed.
Two reviewers independently selected titles and abstracts against inclusion and exclusion criteria and the full text of any potentially relevant papers was reviewed.
From the 17 remaining articles, the full text of the papers was reviewed and 8 more were eliminated leaving 9 studies finally included in this review.
Similar(55)
The papers were reviewed by a total of 17 reviewers.
The full texts of potentially relevant papers were reviewed for inclusion by the same reviewers independently.
At all steps papers were reviewed and data extracted by two independent reviewers.
El Naschie rejected the allegations and said his papers were reviewed "in the normal way".
"The papers were reviewed by the MPS and the investigation accepted.
Although more than 5,500 papers were reviewed, the comparison of diet drinks with water was based on just three.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com