Sentence examples for papers that were excluded from inspiring English sources

Searches identified twelve papers that were excluded.

The maximum information was obtained from the 13 papers that were excluded (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

In the case of the CEA Registry, the classifier missed only 1 eligible article (sensitivity about 99%), and incorrectly considered relevant ~28% of the papers that were excluded by human reviewers in 2010 (specificity around 73%).

Papers that were excluded totalled 1893 (not published in English, Type 1 diabetes, children, title of study deemed to be outside the scope or not relevant to the scope of the review, other).

These figures comprise papers included in the study (225 in the intervention group and 246 in the control group) and papers that were excluded because of failure to find a reviewer (23 in the intervention group and 31 in the control group).

In all three genetic topics, the proposed semiautomated strategy correctly identified all citations that were included in the systematic reviews in 2010 (100% sensitivity) and considered relevant only ~10% of the papers that were excluded by the human experts (specificity of about 90%).

In summary, 26 studies did not provide data on sensitivity and specificity, 13 items involved overlapping populations, 15 items were review papers while the remaining items that were excluded were case reports (2), editorials (3) and guidelines papers (2) (Fig.  1).

Those that exclude need those that are excluded to be excluded to define them.

After full-text reading, four papers not related to work exposure and 10 papers that were not methodologically appropriate were excluded (no real control group, [ 20- 26] exposure not defined or discussed by authors) [ 27- 29].

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram [ 23] (Fig.  1) shows the numbers of papers that were retrieved and excluded following dual selection by two independent reviewers, together with the reasons for exclusion.

Articles unrelated to primary headache disorders, review articles, drug treatment studies, case reports, letters and comments, and papers that were not written in English were excluded.