Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(9)
There were 1172 papers identified for examination.
None of the 21 papers identified for analysis were classed as "not relevant".
Abstracts were reviewed, full papers obtained, and papers identified for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers.
However, papers identified for review provided little about how the choice of TOP provider is framed, or even what choices are available.
In all, nine of the 35 papers identified for review were from Brazil, where less than 1% of the population are indigenous.
None of the nine papers identified for this review were ICU specific in the title but the ICU was mentioned in the main text body.
Similar(51)
The citations for each paper identified for inclusion in the review were also checked using the cited reference component of the Web of Science database.
The initial database search generated 14592 papers, 134 papers were identified for further scrutiny but more detailed assessment by up to four authors yielded 36 papers [ 12- 47] that were eligible for inclusion in the final review (figure 1).
The bibliographies of the papers identified were searched for additional relevant citations.
Two papers identified the relaxed environment for the tutors as being conducive to learning [ 20, 24].
The papers identified were further screened for data on pathogens identified in patients with CAP and/or antibiotic treatment in patients with CAP.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com