Exact(11)
Here we review 130 published papers extracted from Web of Science for 1995 to 2014 that have applied models to analyse scenarios of agricultural impacts on nutrients loadings at catchment scale.
To this data set of relevant papers we add a random set of 50 papers, extracted from the set of papers associated to the similar sequences, associated themselves in the first step with the initial sequences entered by the biologist.
Add to the extracted set of papers classified as relevant in the previous step of the tool, 50 papers extracted randomly from the relevant papers associated to the input sequences.
The inherent difficulty in addressing this problem is well illustrated by the citation history of papers extracted from the Physical Review (PR) corpus (Fig. 1A), consisting of 463,348 papers published between 1893 and 2010 and spanning all areas of physics (3).
Run step 1 through step 5 of the tool to get a set of potentially relevant papers; Add to the extracted set of papers classified as relevant in the previous step of the tool, 50 papers extracted randomly from the relevant papers associated to the input sequences.
MD performed the searches, retrieved papers, extracted data.
Similar(49)
Assessor 1 analysed the even numbered papers, assessor 2 analysed the odd numbered papers extracting the relevant information to complete the Quality of Reporting checklist (see Supporting Information S1).
This iterative process involved reading and re-reading the papers, extracting relevant information, and identifying common themes within the reported findings.
Authors of the paper extracted relevant themes emerging from the interview transcripts across the two phases.
Medvet et al. [14] considered a venue recommendation system based on the idea of matching the topics of a paper, extracted from the title and abstract, with those of possible publication venues for the paper.
This paper extracts the 6-year temporal signal without AAM effects using NMWT method, quantitatively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com