Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Many of the papers categorized as neutral suggested possible clinical benefit despite a negative result.
Similar(59)
The traumas would be categorized as moderate.
All adverse events were categorized as mild.
Most of these papers were categorized as low quality and therefore not included in our final results.
Eight of the papers were categorized as level 1 or 2 evidence based on the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
The quality of included papers were categorized as 'high' if 7-8 criteria were met, 'moderate' if 5-6 criteria were met and 'low' if 4 or less criteria were met.
This review paper is categorized as follows.
The rest of the paper is categorized as follows.
All the optimization problems dealt with in this paper can be categorized as either minimizing the expected total system cost subject to system reliability requirements, or maximizing system reliability subject to total system cost limitation.
The remaining seven papers (6%) were categorized as published in journals and as conference papers related to engineering education, education or science education, and information science or information science technology.
The definition of what constitutes an article, a review or other item has been a contentious issue and some journals may try to increase their impact factor by publishing items that are not categorized as papers counted in the denominator of impact factor calculations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com