Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
But the process will be streamlined using the Internet to ensure that papers are assessed in a matter of weeks, rather than months, and authors will be able to track their papers' progress through the review process.
Similar(59)
The quality of the papers was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) assessment tool for qualitative research.
The methodological quality of included papers was assessed using the PRIMARK (Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies) assessment tool.
These full-text papers were assessed independently by the two readers (NHJC and AEG) using a pilot-tested assessment form.
Overall, the papers were assessed as being low in terms of evidential hierarchy and the quality of the papers was assessed as being on average fair.
The papers were assessed based on the structure and quality of the introduction, research method, results and conclusion.
Papers were assessed based on whether they address problems of physical product flows and/or operational logistics interfaces between channels.
Papers were assessed based on their decision modeling, demand models and their relation to space and reorder planning.
Commentary papers were assessed in relation to key issues about follow-up care.
Twenty-two selected papers were assessed by two independent reviewers and the majority of studies scored low risk of bias on the selected items.
All relevant papers were assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment of the Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Included in Systematic Reviews (QUADAS) criteria [12].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com