Exact(1)
Like many of their peers, JGIM editors claim that "the quality of the papers published in the Journal depends on both the authors and the external reviewers who help the editors select the best papers and improve their presentation".[3] We distinguish here between reviewer recommendations (i.e. accept/revise vs. reject) and reviewer comments (narrative assessment and suggestions for improvement).
Similar(59)
Results were similar when limited to published papers, and improved for high-confidence and diminutive polyps.
The results presented in this paper extend and improve the corresponding results of Wang and Osilike.
The results presented in this paper extend and improve the main results in [13] and [19].
The results presented in this paper extend and improve the related results of [5] and [4].
The main results in this paper extend and improve the corresponding results in the current literature.
The results in this paper generalize and improve some well-known results in the literature.
The results of this paper modify and improve many other important recent results.
The results in this paper extend and improve some known results in the literature.
The results presented in this paper extend and improve several well-known comparable results.
The results presented in the paper extend and improve many recent results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com