Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(17)
As the number of panels P increases, then the number of chambers C = 765 Pincreases and therefore the estimation of the ratio becomes more accurate as well as the confidence interval shrinks.
T- test statistical analysis was performed among the two populations (for both panels p < 0001).
The same relationship also held between the diploid ADCL and diploid PD panels (P = 1.871 × 10−4).
Table 2 indicates that the ERBB2 gene was the most differentially expressed gene for both panels (p < 0.0001).
For both panels, ERBB2 gene expression was significantly lower in HER2- than in HER2+ samples for all three probes on both panels (p < 0.003 for all probes).
Again, the initial expression patterns of TIP2 2 and TIP2 3 are mirrored in the lateral roots (Fig 1, panels P and Q).
Similar(43)
By mid-/late EGK-III stages (Fig. 2A, 4th and 5th column panels), p-PolII signals became progressively stronger and could be readily detected in many central cells.
Three real time RT-PCR panels were designed to identify G1, G2, G9, G12 (panel GI), G3, G4, G8, G10 (panel GII), and P[4], P[6], P[8], P[10], P[11] (panel P), respectively.
The most stable WCIs are those connected to physical pain - such as myalgia (panel n), back/shoulder pain (panel o), arm pain (panel p), leg pain (panel q), and both headache variables (panels r and a1) - and these WCIs tend to have a slight decrease between 2007 and 2009 and a small increase between 2009 and 2012.
The NELL1 SNP rs1793004 also showed a disease association in the UC case-control panel (p = 0.0017 in the allele-based χ2 test) and the odds ratio for homozygosity of the common C allele was 1.54 (95% CI: 1.08 2.20 ).
However, there was significantly lower protective activity in CVL obtained following coitus (Visit 4 vs. Visit 3, Fig. 3, middle panel) (p = 0.01) and no significant difference in the antiviral activity of post-gel, postcoital CVL (Visit 3) compared to postcoital CVL (Visit 2) (p = 0.56; Fig. 3, lower panel).
More suggestions(6)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com