The word 'panelists' is correct and can be used in written English.
It is used to refer to people who are participating on a panel. For example: The panelists discussed various topics related to urban education.
The leaders' reputations are converging – except Sturgeon Tracked over time, the leaders' reputations now cluster together, representing a significant drop for Farage – much less popular than his party – a small drop for Cameron, effective but uninspiring, and a small rise for Miliband, who surprised panelists (admittedly from a low bar).
We will be joined on the night by panelists Sylvie Aboa-Bradwell of the Policy Centre for African Peoples; Edward Paice, Director of Africa Research Institute and Onyekachi Wambu from AFFORD, the African Foundation for Development.
Little has changed, and the party brands are static At the start of the campaign we asked panelists to imagine each party as if they were a person.
That said, and despite the mountain of leaflets and letters that many of our panelists wade through each morning, national stories dominate the daily diaries – almost eight times as many as there were local stories.
But you can't read The Swan Book, you can't read Floodline without encountering the real world," Tsiolkas began, referring to the works of the other panelists.
Five years on, some still have a shaky view of what a coalition actually means Many of our panelists are cynical about the feasibility of making a coalition work.
Crucially, most of these interactions are panelists' spontaneous thoughts: voters telling us what interests them, not the other way round.
Technology now enables protests to erupt almost instantly and political leaders will have to tread carefully if they want to keep the peace.For business, panelists mentioned several risky areas, including the costs of an ageing workforce, the effects of climate change on the supply chain and regulatory uncertainty.
The government's efforts to do just that in this case helped produce the housing bubble, which led directly to crisis and recession.A neat story, but one that prompted compelling criticisms from the other two panelists.
But when the panelists received it, they refused to review it.Their reasons for refusing are not entirely clear.
You might think this all hass little to do with philanthropy, but all of the panelists saw e-philanthropy in broad terms as the way tech can be applied to bring about social change.
