Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(40)
Increases in panel reactive antibodies have been identified in human subjects.
Pre- and post-renal transplantation panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening is associated with increased incidence of hyperacute or acute graft rejection and graft loss.
To correlate these responses with novel preimplantation processing methods to reduce cellularity, both a relevant panel reactive antibody assay and a chronic implantation animal model are necessary.
We modified a human flow cytometric panel reactive antibody assay for ovine model use to detect antibody responses to residual antigen-loading decellularized scaffolds engineered from pulmonary artery tissue.
To determine the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy on five transfusion dependent, highly sensitized adolescents on dialysis, we serially measured percentage panel reactive antibody (%PRA) levels, titers of identifiable discrete anti-HLA Class I antibody specificities, and non-specific indices of cellular immunity before and following initiation of rHuEPO therapy.
Demographic data, survival information, and level of last pre-transplant panel reactive antibody (PRA) were collected.
Similar(20)
Results of panel-reactive antibody and cross-reactivity tests showed no evidence of immune responses.
A sample with reactivity of 10% or more was considered positive for panel-reactive anti-HLA antibodies [31], [32].
Like 3 out of 10 kidney-transplant candidates, she had tested positive on a blood test called P.R.A., for panel-reactive antibody — proteins primed to attack foreign tissue, including her mother's.
The complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative before transplantation in all patients and only positive for panel-reactive antibody in one patient.
Lee, J. et al. Maternal HLA Panel-Reactive Antibodies in Early Gestation Positively Correlate with Chronic Chorioamnionitis: Evidence in Support of the Chronic Nature of Maternal Anti-fetal Rejection.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com