Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(22)
The experimental design is outlined schematically in Fig. 2c, upper panel: (Group 1) Dox + IFNγ was kept throughout the course of the experiment; (Group 2) IFNγ was removed after 24 hrs, fresh Dox was added and kept throughout; (Group 3) Dox was removed after 24 hrs and IFNγ kept throughout; (Group 4) both Dox and IFNγ were removed after 24 hrs.
It is possible to show that there is a 71% chance that the panel group from which the damaged panel came, was struck by lightning using LDN data alone.
In this panel, group 2 is selected and all the currently enrolled participants are shown right next to it.
Round 3 was only sent out to those who had replied to round 2; thus, the same 24 member panel group took part in round 3 of these, 21 (90%) responded.
This group shared their results with Swedish expert panel group.
Using concordance data, the reproducibility of the calibrated panel (group 3) was confirmed as >95%.
Similar(38)
This paper further enhances the analytical power of Delphi methodology by identifying the advantages, disadvantages and challenges presented by increasing diversity among panel groups.
Fig. 3 In both HV (left panel) and MO (right panel) groups, Z-score of the independent component (IC 15, encompassing the visuo-spatial system and medial visual cortical areas, correlated negatively with bilateral thalamic fractional anisotropy (FA) values.
Only primary health care professionals attended these panel groups.
The first step was to establish two expert panel groups in Iran and Sweden.
After this visit, each child was assigned randomly to one of eight panel groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com