The phrase "pairwise analysis between" is correct and usable in written English.
It generally refers to the comparison of two items in a set of data. For example, "We used pairwise analysis between the two sample groups to compare their responses."
Statistically significant differences in pairwise analysis between all generated groups are presented in Table 2b.
Concordance of methylation between family members with CS was calculated with Kendall's coefficient of concordance by pairwise analysis between proband and first- and second-degree relatives.
Using a nonparametric Wilcoxon/Kruskal Wallis test to identify differential levels (pairwise analysis between cell lines; between 12 and 40 independent cell line measurements per comparison, Table 1) at P-value of <0.05, four compounds were significantly different in at least one binary comparison (Table 1, Supplementary Table S1).
A pairwise analysis was performed between groups: Good SRH at baseline and follow-up; Poor SRH at baseline and follow-up; Poor SRH at baseline and Good at follow-up, Good SRH at baseline and Poor at follow-up.
For each pairwise analysis the difference between the two measures was plotted against the mean measurement for those two instruments for each individual, along with the limits of agreement (the range of values that would be expected to include 95% of individual differences).
Pairwise analysis of geographical distribution between taxa showed that no single species group exhibited a consistent pattern of congruence with other taxa (Table 3).
Pairwise analysis of gene expression between treatments revealed a large set of genes that were significantly differentially expressed between mated and virgin queens: 829 genes at FDR < 0.05 (Fig. 3 and Additional file 8).
A significant time effect was detected for fat-free mass (p = 0.005, η = 0.212, power = 0.884) with subsequent pairwise analysis revealing significant increases between baseline (T1) and T2 (p = 0.004), T3 (p = 0.004), and T4 (p = 0.018), indicating both CrM-CHO, and CHO significantly increased fat-free mass following 12 weeks of resistance training.
The Pearson pairwise analysis confirmed significant positive correlations between accumulation and ring content, as well as positive correlations with hydrophobicity.
Hence, to determine network reproducibility, we performed a pairwise analysis and determined the overlap between the modules produced by the two contrasting methods.
Pairwise analysis of the miRNA abundance between root libraries identified 33 (8 increased, and 25 decreased), 27 (7 increased, and 20 decreased), and 29 (8 increased, and 21 decreased) significantly differentially expressed miRNAs (|log2ratio| ≥ 1, adjusted P-value ≤0.01) between 2y 1y, 3y 1y, and 3y 2y root samples, respectively (Additional file 7: Table S6).
