Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The function ranks relevant pairs higher than irrelevant pairs.
Hence, if there is rejection of the non-convergence null for a proportion of the inflation gap pairs higher than any reasonable test size (e.g. 10 or 5%%), the evidence would be favorable to convergence.
The figure shows that the MMC method consistently ranks these probe pairs higher than either of the other methods.
In particular, ChIP-seq method can accurately detect moderate/high avidity TFBSs at a resolution (up to several base pairs) higher than for any previous ChIP method [ 2, 5].
Similar(56)
For a highly correlated feature pair (higher than a threshold), the feature with lower MI score is considered redundant and removed from the feature subset to prevent multicollinearity.
The mean SS Rel scores for F1 pairs and F2 pairs are higher than those for across F1F2 pairs in 51 (87.9%) moonlighting proteins (MPR1-3 datasets).
Importantly, this notion is also different from that drawn from the vertebrate genomes, in which the conservation ratio of divergent pairs is higher than that of tandem pairs, suggesting a negative selection on the separation of divergent pairs during evolution of vertebrates [ 4].
In addition, it is worth to note that the light transmission of both Al2O3/ZrO2/alucone (one pair) and Al2O3/ZrO2/alucone (three pairs) are higher than those of the Al2O3 and ZrO2 layers at the range of 400 to 700 nm.
Thus, heterotic hybrids showed more nonadditive expression, and the proportion of differentially expressed probe sets in heterotic parent pairs was higher than for the non-heterotic pair.
We observed that 53% of genes with tandem conserved poly(A) sites had a conserved efficiency pattern (227 gene pairs), significantly higher than expected by chance (146 gene pairs, binomial distribution P = 9.7 × 10-28).
These results demonstrated that the level of co-modification in parallel gene pairs was higher than that of the divergent or convergent pairs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com