Sentence examples for pairings I from inspiring English sources

The lowest energy conformer for the resulting S-MB homodimer maintained a close antiparallel apposition between the two Trp-Leu pairings (i.e., Trp-9A to Leu-10B and Leu-10A to Trp-9B; A and B referring to the two S-MB sequences in the homodimer).

Similarly, in rainbow trout, there are 7 homeologous pairings (i.e., RT2q/RT9q; RT27p/RT31p; RT2p/RT29q; RT7p/RT15p; RT12p/RT16p; RT14p/RT20q; and RT10q/RT18) that are represented by even greater numbers of duplicated marker affinities, and all of these regions, with the exception of RT18, fall within metacentric type chromosomes.

Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were next computed to directly compare HAM-D6 ratings for patient clinician pairings (i.e., patient self-report vs. corresponding clinician ratings for that patient).

From these, 662 were considered as risk pairings, i.e. the mother had a risk of 0.5 to be a carrier (i.e. one of the grandparents was an obligate carrier) and 35 calves out of these were diagnosed as affected.

In contrast, in the left anterior temporal region there was increased activation to the pairing of familiar form and motion (i.e., human form-human action and robot form-robot action) relative to unfamiliar pairings (i.e., human form-robot action).

Finally, since data were anonymous traditional paired t-tests were not possible, we still identified significant and educationally meaningful differences between pre and post assessments using the most conservative and unfavorable pairings (i.e. worst case scenario) with respect to our hypothesis.

While the six species cluster into three strongly supported sister-pairings: (i) The black/white, (ii) the woolly/Sumatran, and (iii) the Javan/Indian, resolution of the higher-level relationships has no statistical support.

Hence, the ordinate position of the starting point of the Δ-vs-Σ trajectory estimates the effective free energy change upon replacing the central base in complementary WC-pairings, i.e. Δp(0) ≈ -Δ εWC-WC Bp) (see Eqs. (11) and (21)).

An ambiguity is found if two pairings s i, t 12, s j, t 12 in the remaining H t 12 share a single blob m k,t.

Despite the effort to enforce the identical base pairing rules (cf. filter step 1 in Table 4), there is still an abundance of C‐G and G‐C pairings occurring (i.e., non-consecutive, but distributed in the group of three or four).

Formally, a parse y for a pair of sequences a and b is a set whose elements consist of base pairings (a i, a j ) belonging to sequence a, base pairings (b k, b l ) belonging to sequence b, and aligned positions (a i, b k ) between a and b.