Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Last year's pairing would have matched Connecticut or West Virginia against Kansas.
They are also concerned about the effects the pairing would have on the budding market for video delivered via the Internet.
As the difference between carbonaria and typica is due to a pair of alleles of a single gene, with the carbonaria allele being fully genetically dominant to the typica allele (Bowater 1914), the carbonaria moth in this pairing would have to be heterozygous to produce equal numbers of carbonaria and typica offspring.
After all, a more traditional pairing would have been the Fume Blanc – spice sometimes makes Chardonnay taste flabby and oaky.
Given the low repeatability of female responsiveness in extra-pair trials and the large effect of male attractiveness (see above), plus the fact that males did not court females at all in 15% of the extra-pair trials, clearly more than four extra-pair encounters per social pairing would have been required to obtain a repeatable copulation record.
By comparison, a Sanger-based survey with 700 bp reads, and with no read pairing, would have a sampling rate of 1 fragment/10 kb at 7% coverage.
Similar(54)
This pairing would've been awful".
But no pair would have ever done that.
In past years the pair would have sailed into Schengen once they had done their homework.
In the West, the pair would have faced shareholder lawsuits and possibly criminal charges.
Imagine what the pair would have got up to in the age of Amazon.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com