Sentence examples for pairing strength from inspiring English sources

The pairing strength can be determined by measuring an energy gap, Δ, which equals 1.76kBTc in a standard BCS superconductor1.

Therefore, the induced singlet superconducting pairing strength can be described by Δ x = Δ e i ϕ L Θ x + e i ϕ R Θ x - l where Θ x) is the Heaviside step function, Δ and φ are the superconducting gap and the phase of superconducting order parameter, respectively.

Biochemical evidence suggests that evolution has tuned tRNA sequence and modifications to balance the contributions of amino acid identity, codon pairing strength, and tRNA structure to binding affinity of a given tRNA, such that most aminoacylated tRNAs have similar affinity to ribosomal A sites (Olejniczak et al., 2005; Dale et al., 2009; Shepotinovskaya and Uhlenbeck, 2013).

While searching for clues for this incongruity of the base-pairing behavior, the existence of a correlation between acid ionization/dissociation constants (p Ka) of the complementary base-pairing partners and the base-pairing strength was noticed.

Changing the "internal hydrophobicity" of RNA/DNA (e.g., by varying the length of the bases) would affect not only the base-pairing strength but the also the sensitivity to base-pairing mismatch.

The weak base-pairing behavior of orotamide 6 with adenine (Δp Ka ≈ 3) versus the stronger base pairing of 5 with thymine (Δp Ka ≈ 5) is consonant with the Δp Ka/base-pairing strength correlation (Table 1).

Thus, the selection of a purine pyrimidine base pair (over a purine purine or pyrimidine pyrimidine) may be a reflection of the optimization (and not maximization) of base-pairing strength, a result of the balancing act between strength of the assemblage and its sensitivity to mismatch or defects by control of the internal hydrophobicity versus external hydrophilicity.

It is interesting that the two most frequently used classifying criteria, oxygen metabolism and Gram type, are not associated with variance of synonymous codon pair strength as are genomic features such as G + C content, genome size, and tRNA gene number.

In each case, the neutron and proton pairing-strength values are G nn  = G pp  = 0.125 MeV.

A comparison of the different p Ka values of the alternative heterocycles with those of the complementary canonical nucleobases, with a side-by-side qualitative relationship with base-pairing strengths (Table 1) accentuates this correlation between the magnitude of Δp Ka of complementary partners with the base-pairing strength of the duplexes formed.

When pressed the pair miss strength and power, but with time on the ball for Xhaka to probe and Ramsey to make forward runs, both got at United.