Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Each link has a weight that represents the normalized measure of contact between the connected pair of respondents or nodes.
Similar(59)
30 The matching resulted in 1362 pairs of respondents (excluding 15 respondents reporting ADE), each respondent with self-reported ADEs matched by the estimated propensity scores to a respondent without ADE, for whom costs were compared.
Thus as a sensitivity analysis, we tested whether results changed by treating pairs of respondent (adolescent and parents) as having consistent responses if both parties had non-responses.
After reading the information about the pair of gambles, respondents must mark one of the two gambles as preferred on the paper form.
For each pair of scenarios, respondents were asked to indicate the one they would most prefer when considering how their asthma should be managed (see Figure 1).
The experiments, based upon repeated hypothetical discrete choices between pairs of locations, involved respondents from firms making trade-offs between the various characteristics in a fractional factorial, orthogonal survey design.
In this study, we modeled different livelihood landscapes as networks where the nodes represent different occupations, and where links between pairs of nodes represent respondents who have reported both the corresponding occupations.
To calculate the weights, the respondents judged each pair of decision criteria on a scale from 9 to 1 to 9, with the two extremes (score 9) indicating that the present criterion is extremely more important than the one it is compared to, and the middle of the scale (1) indicating equal importance.
The first pair of results columns contain estimates across all respondents while the final two pairs of columns display conditional results for those farms that had and had not used risk management tools.
29% of respondents disapproved.
Thirteen percent of respondents were undecided.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com