When this is done, BP1 status explains 45% of the variance in gene expression, while the mother-child pair index explains just 3%, indicating that shared inheritance only explains a small proportion of the variance within the two BP1 profiles.
We use ν=(n,k) as the time-frequency pair index.
Figure 9 Sampled PSFs with pair indexes from the lower right quadrant of BLUR1 PSF field with low level of noise and different star densities.
Although the technique presented in Sect. 3 gives error-bounded distance estimation in O(1) time, the storage cost of subgraph pair index depends on the underlying graph topology structure.
Figure 7 Sampled PSFs with pair indexes from the lower right quadrant of BLUR1 PSF field with medium star density (40,000 stars, pooling region of 256×256 pixels with half block overlapping).
It is obvious that { P k } k = 0 N - 1 is a partition for P. We denote P ¯ k = { ( n, k ) | ∀ n } - P as the subset of time-frequency pair indexes which are not pilot for a given frequency index k.
An ANOVA on this reduced dataset of 32 individuals showed that the pair index explains half of the variance in the first principal component of transcript abundance, suggesting very high heritability.
If it is instead assumed that this separation is entirely due to environment, then the minimal genetic contribution can be estimated as the proportion of variance explained by the pair index when both generation, and BP1A or BP1B status, are included in the model.
Each adapter contained a five-base pair index linked to Illumina adapter sequences.
A unique four base pair index sequence is located immediately downstream from the sequencing primer binding site.
Index l identifies the twin pair, index k identifies the specific twin within the pair and index i identifies the specific repeated measurement (most DNA samples were measured twice).
