Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Internal consistency and validity were evaluated against the 1-hour pad test.
Correlations with 1h pad test were low and non-significant for both versions.
A positive relationship was found between grams of urine loss on a 24-hour pad test and IIQ-7 scores (r = 0.34,P =.0.34,P.51,P =.0.34,P
In 1967, after the space capsule fire that killed three astronauts in a launching pad test, NASA chose Mr. Lederer to establish an Office of Manned Space Flight Safety.
Conclusion: In the community-dwelling population, without a urodynamic diagnosis, neither long nor short versions of the questionnaires correlate with the severity of the urinary incontinence as shown by the pad test.
The objective was to compare the sensitivity of the 20-min pad test by infusion of 250 ml of water with the strong-desire amount in the bladder in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Results: Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.36, 0.20, and −0.50 among the Patient Global Impression of Severity question and incontinence episode frequency, stress pad test, and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results, respectively (all P <.0001).
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether self subjective assessment of urinary incontinence as perceived by female patients could replace the standard 1-hour pad test in clinical practice.
Mean incontinence episode frequency and median stress pad test results increased and mean Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results decreased with increasing Patient Global Impression of Severity question severity levels.
To compare the outcomes of midurethral tape continence surgery in patients with urodynamically confirmed stress incontinence (USI) and patients with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence but normal urodynamic studies (NUDS) and a positive 1-h pad test.
Assessment variables included incontinence episode frequency, the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire results, fixed volume (400 mL) stress pad test results, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement and of Severity question results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com