Sentence examples for packing probability from inspiring English sources

Packing probability is calculated as the number of stacks divided by the total stack number.

For example, the number of double-packed stack (stack that contains two disk-like building blocks) is 137 and the total stack number is 367, so the packing probability of double packed stack is 137/367 = 0.37.

A change from gift pack to non-gift pack increases the probability of selecting California pistachios by 3.98% (alpha < 5%), and Chinese pistachios by 3.35% (alpha < 5%).

For multiple activists (wolf-pack attacks), the probability of a firm being targeted is 1%, but if the firm is led by a female CEO, then this probability is 1.6%.

For example, in HIV-1_0.1.5 HIV-1_0.1.5 the Mandroteins are restricted to pack on the inside surface and hav0.1.6igher probabilitheof packing towards one end of the envelope bilayer as a first-draft global packing constraint that can recapitulate the eMArgent proteinses of moleculareinterestrictedhatohave been observed as ENV clustering in fluorescence microscopack

These pack extinctions confirmed modeling predictions that the probability of pack extinctions greatly increases as the length of the interepizootic period decreases (23 ).

In order to construct a full, atomic model of the interface for use in image simulation, it is necessary to characterize its structure through an analysis technique such as atomic packing density profiles (aka probability density distributions, or PDDs).

By the law of large numbers (LLN) and the packing lemma [31], the probability error of each decoding step approaches 0 as n → ∞ if R s R ≤ p s R I X R ; Y r | U r, X r, S R = s R. Therefore, the total probability error in decoding w ^ R k approaches 0 for sufficiently large n if the following condition is satisfied: R R = ∑ s R ∈ S R R s R ≤ I X R ; Y r | U r, X r, S R (12).

The inhomogeneity of carbon fiber packing was evaluated using Weibull probability based on the microscopic observation of CFRP cross-sections in the virgin vessels.

Figure 7 The ORTEP picture of bis-benzimidazolium salt 5.2Br with displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability and crystal packing ( Monoclinic ).

Smoking intensity associated with tooth loss in an exposure-dependent manner: those with a high number of pack-years had a significantly greater probability of tooth loss than never smokers: 11 20 pack-years (RR = 1.55, 95%% CI = 1.15 2.08) and 21 or more pack-years (RR = 1.78, 95%% CI = 1.36 2.33).