Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
We evaluated several genes using the PHYLIP package (data not shown) with indeterminate results[ 22].
The evaluation results are essentially the same using the top 30 enriched terms from topGO package (data not shown).
The distributions of the resulting values followed a normal distribution (tested with Shapiro.test function in R Stats package; data not shown) and were used for QTL analysis.
The 32 enriched FAs are comprised of 8786%6%) of the overall 101 genes annotated in FAs by the IPA package (Data not shown).
We confirmed homogeneity between the TC:HDL-C values at baseline among the studies using the metafor package (data not shown).
To further investigate the prediction accuracy of FindMiRNA combined with the chosen selection parameters and thresholds, covariance models from 46 known microRNA families were deduced from RFam 8.1 [ 24] and used to search the grape genome for homologues to known structural RNA families with the Infernal software package (data not shown) [ 25].
Similar(54)
In addition to the read-depth analysis performed using CNVRd2, CNVRs were detected with the R package cn.Mops (data not shown).
This GSEA produced no significantly (FDR <0.25 and p-value <0.05) enriched gene sets for any of the three gene set packages used (data not shown).
Furthermore, we analyzed KpnI-digested DNA from the infected cells by Southern blotting with the probes generated from GFP (Figure 1E) and MLV packaging signal (data not shown).
Further analysis of experimental data indicated that no phams generated by Phamerator contained terminases belonging to phages with different packaging strategies (data not shown).
The pairwise alignment of PF11_0220 against PIK-related protein kinase and rapamycin target of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (gi: 6322526) was performed with standard and PfFSmat60 matrices by fasta program (FASTA package, version 3) [ 9] (Additional File 10: Supplementary Figure 8) and water program (EMBOSS package, version 6.3.1) (data not shown).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com