Sentence examples for ownership p from inspiring English sources

Statistical significant difference in the prevalence of the disease was found among Sub-districts, sex, re-settlement, sleeping outdoor and dog ownership (P < 0.05).

Donor's residences were spatially clustered around blood donning centers and PCR prevalence was 18% in rural municipalities with 20 1330 inhabitants, 12% in those with 1467 5088 inhabitants and 3% in larger communities, and was associated with dog ownership (p < 0.05).

There is positive significance related to foreign ownership (p < 0.01), which gives good grounds of the claim that foreign direct investment is major contribution to development of domestic economy.

In separate tests controlling for altitude, marginally significant source location (P = 0.10) and ownership (P = 0.05) effects were evident, but no altitudinal effects on diffusion rates were found (P = 0.34, 0.53) (Table 3).

Although no significant interaction effects were found in the diffusion of seed obtained through informal systems and as grain, complete independence of diffusion rates on source type and source location (P = 0.70; G = 1.4, 3df) and on ownership (P = 0.53; G = 2.2, 3df) could not be rejected when seed from formal systems was excluded from the analyses (Table 2).

Mean age of children increased along with asset ownership (p < 0.001).

Mobile phone ownership (p<0.001; p = 0.03) and the ability to communicate in an NOL orally (p<0.001; p = 0.002) or in writing (both p<0.001), were significantly lower in rural compared to semi-urban and urban settings respectively.

See report of Committee on Fundamental Equipment, submitted to the President's Conference on Home Building and Home Ownership, December 3 , 1931 p. 107; Elsie P. Wolcott, 'Use and Cost of Ice in Families with Children,' published by the department of public welfare of the city of Chicago.

This area, located bilaterally in the parietal opercula [34], plays a key role in sensorimotor integration [35], and has been involved in the assessment of action ownership ([25], p. 2, [36]).

Notes CI: Confidence interval Economic conditions of non-IDPs were significantly better than IDPs with regard to the structural and asset ownership variables (p < 0.001 for both variables), and there was no significant difference in consumption between IDPs and non-IDPs.

Significant differences between the two divisions were found in the ownership of radios (p = 0.019), sofa sets (p = 0.002), vegetable gardens (p = 0.015) and fruit trees (p < 0.0001).