We categorized items 1 5 as ownership items, and 6 10 as disownership items.
In addition, we calculated the correlation between scores of ownership items and disownership items when the asynchronous condition was subtracted from the synchronous condition.
In Experiments 1 and 2, we asked participants to rate ownership items and disownership items adopted from Longo et al. (2008) and to indicate OT.
Simple main effects revealed that both ownership and disownership items were rated more positively under the synchronous condition than under the asynchronous condition, and ownership items were rated more positively than disownership items under both synchronous and asynchronous conditions.
Moreover, the post hoc Tukey indicated that the ownership items were rated more positively than control items in the synchronous condition (p < 0.05) and the disownership items were rated more positively than control items in the synchronous condition (p < 0.05).
But as ownership items, I think they're headed the way of pocket watches – a niche item for people who care about this kind of item, probably even collect it.
This is to say, participants were more likely to affirm questionnaire items under the synchronous condition than under the asynchronous condition, and ownership items were more strongly affirmed than disownership items.
Both the correlations between OT and ownership items (r = −0.39, p < 0.05) and between OT and disownership items (r = −0.35, p < 0.05), when the asynchronous condition was subtracted from the synchronous condition, were significant.
Moreover, we calculated correlations between the two questionnaires: correlations between ownership items (r = 0.57, p < 0.05) and disownership items (r = 0.76, p < 0.01) for the two questionnaires were significant.
Third, we calculated the correlation between scores of ownership items and disownership items when the asynchronous condition was subtracted from the synchronous condition for data collected from both questionnaires.
