Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The agreement between global (subjective) and overall items average (objective) scores were found to be 78% (Pearson's Correlation).
Overall, items contained an average of 1.54 (SD = 0.88) functioning distractors.
For each item, average values were obtained.
The overall average item-own scale correlation was 0.56 for the antenatal phase, 0.68 for the birth phase and 0.73 for the post partum phase.
For the overall professionalism items the average bias between the actual population and simulated values was 10.9%.
The pre and post training overall average scores (item 21 of the instrument) for the SP consultations were 7.06 (SD = 0.92) and 8.26 (SD = 0.99) respectively showing a significant improvement (p <.0.027) when analysed using the paired t test.
Overall, the average number of reported items in each RCT abstract, based on the CONSORT for Abstracts checklist, was three.
Content items averaged a 53% reporting rate.
For each student, the percent correct was calculated for the LCTSR, low-level, and high-level items and for an overall average performance for the full exam.
Outcomes Manuscript quality, assessed with a 5 point Likert scale (primary: overall quality; secondary: average quality of specific items in paper).
We measured the overall average score of each item to rank the criteria of selecting residents.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com