The phrase "over unreasonable" is not grammatically correct and is not commonly used in written English.
It is possible that someone may use it in spoken English, as a colloquial or informal expression, but it would not be considered grammatically correct or appropriate in formal writing. Instead of "over unreasonable," you could use phrases like "excessively unreasonable," "unreasonably excessive," or "more than unreasonable." For example: - The new rules were deemed excessively unreasonable by the majority of employees. - The company's response to the complaint was unreasonably excessive. - The price was more than unreasonable for the poor quality of the product.
"I'm concerned over unreasonable reaction," he said.
Other rules allow tenants to sue their landlords over unreasonable conditions on tenancy.
Since RNP does not rule out state action that promotes reasonable over unreasonable conceptions of the good, a proponent of this principle can accept it while affirming the perfectionist claim that "certain conceptions of the good are worthless and demeaning, and that political action may and should be taken to eradicate or at least curtail them" (Raz 1986: 133).
While her dog lounged on the floor near her feet, Cohn began to argue that outrage over unreasonable searches was one of the factors that led the American patriots to revolt against King George.
"The proposed Order would also repeal oversight over other unreasonable discrimination and unreasonable practices, and over interconnection with last-mile Internet access providers," the letter reads.
The proposed Order would also repeal oversight over other unreasonable discrimination and unreasonable practices, and over interconnection with last-mile Internet access providers.
The World Health Organization (WHO) considers a population-based rate of cesarean deliveries over 15% unreasonable.
But Mr Bianchi says appalling management and unreasonable, over-powerful unions are another factor behind the financial crisis afflicting Italian opera.
Finally, Levison claims that the subpoena requiring Lavabit to turn over its keys was unreasonable and oppressive: to comply with the government's orders "would have either required Lavabit to perpetrate a fraud on its customer base or shut down entirely".
The official reaction—"dissatisfaction and outrage" over Google's "unreasonable charges"—does not bode well.
So why does a work title in the workplace give people power to 'lord' it over others with unreasonable demands and behaviors?
