Sentence examples for outcomes subjects from inspiring English sources

There appeared to be a dose response relationship between number of prior cases and outcomes; subjects with six or fewer prior cases (at or below the median) did not have significantly poorer outcomes than those with no prior history, while those with seven or more prior cases had significantly fewer opioid-negative months and were less likely to achieve ≥6 opioid negative months.

There was virtually no loss to follow-up for the outcomes; subjects were censored at the end of the appropriate follow-up period if they were still alive.

To prevent a process from leading to more adverse outcomes, subjects should acknowledge their situation and use their own personal resources, if available.

To improve treatment outcomes, subjects should be categorized based on the cause of malnutrition, additional health-concerns, differences in the gut microbiota, and sociological considerations.

These discussions led to four recommendations:   (1) The categories of malnourished individuals need to be differentiated To improve treatment outcomes, subjects should first be categorized based on the cause of malnutrition, additional health-concerns, differences in the gut microbiota, and sociological considerations.

Both outcomes (and outcomes subjected to exploratory analyses) will be analysed using the same procedure.

Other design challenges include ensuring blinding of those adjudicating radiological and clinical outcomes subject to ascertainment bias (for example, pneumonia) and standardization of definitions of complications.

The use of outcomes subject to ascertainment bias, particularly in unblinded studies or non-blinded outcome adjudication and the use of surrogate outcome measure significantly question the validity of these conclusions [ 7].

Based on the primary outcome, subjects were classified into those with and without CIN (Table  1).

For the all-cause mortality outcome, subjects were censored at the conclusion of the follow-up, March 31 , 2011

For each coin outcome, subjects used a pencil to report, "the percentage of times this number of coins followed this cue".