Exact(11)
Between-group differences were found in one of four outcomes (proportion within safe drinking guidelines).
Changes to primary outcomes: Proportion of participants with gametocytes: we added: by microscopy and PCR.
Linked, routinely collected data was used to determine patient level depression outcomes (proportion of depression-free days) and health service usage costs.
Secondary outcomes: proportion of pain relief ([VAS before and after treatment]/[VAS before treatment]), threshold, and tolerance on the trigger point.
The adjusted least square means of the principle outcomes (proportion of subjects with poor function, high pain, high catastrophizing) were calculated for each individual and area-level SES group and tests for SES trend were performed.
There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes (proportion of subjects with total wound closure at 16 weeks; Fig. 2) and time to complete healing (data not shown).
Similar(49)
For dichotomous outcomes, proportions with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
For primary and major secondary outcomes, proportions with confidence intervals were calculated.
For analyses of the two secondary outcomes (proportions of students exceeding drinking guidelines) we used logistic regression models.
The power calculation was based on differences in binary outcomes (proportions), with the assumption that for continuous outcomes, we would have more power to detect differences.
We focus on the following outcomes: Proportions of positive and false-positive cervical cytologies and positive predictive value (PPV) of cervical screening.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com