Outcomes of step 3 are depicted in Table 6.
These attributes support the use of routinely collected hospital administrative data as outcomes of stepped wedge trials.
(b) Multiply the resultant signal from step 3a by the final result from step 2. (c) Take the IFFT of the outcome of step 3b.
Multiply the resultant signal from step 3a by the final result from step 2. Take the IFFT of the outcome of step 3b.
This study is powered to answer the primary research question, i.e. the outcome of stepped care for psychological distress on functional status.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of stepped care for psychological distress on functional status and other aspects of quality of life in patients with hematological malignancy treated with auto-SCT.
The aim is to evaluate the outcome of stepped care for psychological distress on functional status and other aspects of quality of life in patients with hematological malignancy treated with autologous stem cell transplantation.
The absence of the E710 side chain, in the E710A mutant, has a profound effect on the outcome of step 2.1 and the distinction between complementary and mismatched dNTPs.
If shown to be effective, we will explore whether patient characteristics (diagnosis, psychological distress, aspects of quality of life, cognition, coping, social support, and case complexity) moderate outcome of stepped care, using analyses of interaction between patient characteristics and treatment (stepped care vs. care as usual).
On the other hand, tests E2 and E3 are truly two-step procedures, where the null hypothesis value of the test is only established after step L. Consequently, statistical properties of such tests can only be defined conditionally on the outcome of step L. For the interpretation of results we recommend a graphical display, similar to those suggested by others [ 22, 23].
