Sentence examples for outcomes entry from inspiring English sources

Pairwise analyses of the outcomes (entry to discharge) of the three Multidimensional Pain Inventory subgroups were tested using the Mann-Whitney-U-test for significance.

Collection of pharmacokinetic data could be mentioned in the outcome entry fields or elsewhere in the record.

Examination outcome entries where the subject was the same but the grade differed for a candidate were assumed to be resits.

Also, by inviting nurses to participate while they were still students, baseline assessments could be used to adjust for and take into account the potential influence of individual and educational factors on outcomes after entry to working life.

Identifying patients at risk of achieving poor outcomes at entry offers an opportunity to provide enhanced support for this group, which might include the further development of culturally sensitive services or additional support relevant to those living in deprived areas, including better access through improvements in transport or patient incentives to encourage attendance.

With regard to adequately blinding outcome assessment (entry 7), possible differences between the experimental and control groups in methods used for outcome assessment should be described and judged.

Common errors include incomplete registers, failure to update follow-up outcomes, duplicate entries, and incorrect/missing records [ 5].

In the multivariate analyses, logistic regression models were performed to identify the factors independently associated with the outcome variables (entry threshold P < 0.10).

All patient reported outcome measures entries with a joint registry record were also linked to hospital episode statistics (patient reported outcome measures, national joint registry, and hospital episode statistics data).

In recent years an increasing number of studies have emerged to provide data comparing clinical (and pre-clinical) examination outcomes for graduate-entry vs undergraduate-entry students.

Attrition is a potential source of bias in a cohort study if loss to follow-up is related both to exposure and outcome, but BMI outcome at study entry did not differ between those lost to follow-up (18.5 ± 3.6 kg/m) and those with two or more BMI measurements contributing to the analysis (18.3 ± 3.4 kg/m).