Exact(1)
Was a method to measure the outcomes compatible with the current methods utilized in your setting?
Similar(59)
(This is due to the way in which the expected information content of for distinguishing between the two hypotheses will be measured for experiments and observations that are fully outcome compatible; this measure of information content blows up ( becomes infinite) for experiments and observations that fail to be fully outcome compatible).
Thus, the following part of the convergence theorem applies to just that part of the total stream of evidence that consists of experiments and observations that fail to be fully outcome compatible for the pair of hypotheses involved.
It completely ignores the influence of any experiments or observations in the evidence stream on which hypothesis hj is fully outcome-compatible with hypothesis hi.
Hypotheses whose connection with the evidence is entirely statistical in nature will inevitably be fully outcome-compatible on the entire evidence stream.
That is, it applies to all evidence streams for which hj is fully outcome-compatible with hi on each ck in the evidence stream.
It applies to all evidence streams not containing possibly falsifying outcomes for hj when hi holds i.e., it applies to all evidence streams for which hj is fully outcome-compatible with hi on each ck in the stream.
We now turn to a theorem that applies to those evidence streams (or to parts of evidence streams) consisting only of experiments and observations on which hypothesis hj is fully outcome-compatible with hypothesis hi.
To cover evidence streams (or subsequences of evidence streams) consisting entirely of experiments or observations on which hj is fully outcome-compatible with hypothesis hi we will first need to identify a useful way to measure the degree to which hypotheses are empirically distinct from one another on such evidence.
Our model outcomes are compatible with these observations.
The 95% confidence intervals for the primary and many secondary outcomes are compatible with clinically worthwhile benefits.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com