Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Subjects were weighed in light clothing without shoes at each intervention and outcome visit.
The 12-month primary outcome visit was completed by all 68 participants (1 in the intensive group did not complete the MMTT).
The 26-week primary outcome visit was completed by 69 of 74 participants (93%) in the CGM group and 68 of 72 (94%) in the control group, with 5 and 4 participants in the two treatment groups, respectively, discontinuing study participation prior to completion of the 26-week visit (Supplementary Fig. A1).
Of those eligible, 6 declined and 26 were not selected as they were either too similar to those already interviewed (n=15); the final RCT outcome visit was more than 3 months ago (n=5); participant was still employed (n=2) or; was too unwell or could not remember the intervention (n=3).
Similar(56)
More-frequent trips and fewer small trips were associated with healthier purchasing for both outcomes; visiting more store chains was associated with higher percentages of energy from fruit and vegetables.
Logistic regression was used for the dichotomous outcome (repeat visit vs no repeat visit) to model the likelihood of a woman having a repeat visit on the SCC MMV according to potential predictors.
To examine the association of homelessness and medical service utilization, we constructed separate multivariate longitudinal regression models for each outcome: ambulatory visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations.
This allowed for inclusion of a modest number of additional VARA treatment episodes where only an outcome VARA visit (but not a baseline VARA visit) was available.
Bacterial otopathogens between healthy vs AOM visits were compared using logistic regression with bacterial presence as binary outcome and visit type factor variable as predictor.
"Outcome of Visit," the chart said.
One or two outcome raters visit informal caregivers at home to conduct the baseline assessment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com