Suggestions(1)
Exact(15)
A DPCM produces an outcome sample for each input sample.
However, they present important differences as well, which can be summarized as follows: A DPCM produces an outcome sample for each input sample.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which involve cost-effectiveness evaluations rarely use health economic input when undertaking sample size calculations for the trial design; however, in studies undertaken with cost-effectiveness as the primary outcome, sample size calculations should be directly related to the cost-effectiveness result rather than to the effectiveness outcome alone.
For the generation of alerts outcome, sample size was sufficient to include all variables in the multivariate model using alternating logistic regression.
Secondary outcomes and hospital process measures will only be collected from the records of patients included in the primary outcome sample, described above.
However, no more than 30% of included reports presented the primary and second outcome, sample size calculation and outcome estimation, etc.
Similar(45)
Differential binding analysis found 1,192 ER-binding events that were stronger in the poor prognosis/metastasis group in comparison with the good outcome samples and found 599 binding events more prevalent in the good outcome tumors.
These survival curves further show that the classifier in the test sets is unable to discriminate the good prognosis samples that do not overexpress the immune response-module ('good-down') from the poor outcome samples.
The capacity of Teschendorff et al.'s seven gene immune response module to identify good outcome samples from among estrogen-negative tumors may constitute yet more support for this association.
We evaluated the adequacy of randomization and concealment, blinding, reporting of outcomes, sample size calculation, and disclosure of funding sources.
The qualitative study sample will be a subset of the outcomes sample.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com