Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
There was no selective outcome reporting bias in the three studies (Table 2).
To identify factors associated with discrepant outcome reporting in randomized drug trials.
There was a significant variation in study population, the type of DSS used, and outcome reporting.
To examine outcome reporting bias of systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO.
We identified considerable outcome reporting bias.
We did not identify significant outcome reporting bias.
This is where study publication bias and outcome reporting bias overlap.
Risk of bias across studies was evaluated by assessing publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
Recent work [13] [19] has provided direct empirical evidence for the existence of outcome reporting bias.
Eleven of the studies investigated study publication bias and five investigated outcome reporting bias.
We evaluated published study protocols to identify outcome reporting different from appropriate procotols.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com