Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
A multivariable linear regression model is developed for the primary outcome (percent change in BMI z-score) to determine the intervention group effect while controlling for potential confounders (i.e., cohort, percent attendance, household income).
This indirect comparison suggested a greater effect of single dose on days 1 to 2 than on days 3 to 4. There was only one trial of multiple doses on days 1 to 7. We have shown a single outcome, percent of participants with microscopy or PCR-detected gametocytes on day 8, for this comparison as a representative outcome across the trials.
Similar(58)
Multiple linear regression separately tested the explanatory power of five groups of environmental factors for the outcomes, percent predicted FEV1 and asthma severity.
Power and sample size estimates are based on the primary study outcomes, percent weight change (from baseline) and change in HOMA-IR, both after 12 months.
The meta-analyses conducted for integrated non-somatic treatment for co-morbid substance use disorders and depression indicated that while in general, outcomes favoured an integrated treatment, the difference was statistically significant for only one out of four selected outcomes (percent days abstinent at follow-up).
Ordinal regression analyses were performed to test whether changes in TP (policy restrictiveness, individual support measures) and the organizations' stage of change (smoke-free policy, cessation course) predict improvements in health-related outcomes (percent of smokers, second-hand smoke related problems, and absenteeism; research question c).
Newt Gingrich FiveThirtyEight forecast (most likely outcome): 10 percent High end of forecast range: 15 percent Low end of forecast range: 5 percent Mr. Gingrich has spent almost no time in Michigan, instead focusing on Super Tuesday states.
Mitt Romney 538 forecast (most likely outcome): 29 percent High end of forecast range: 39 percent Low end of forecast range: 19 percent Mr. Romney could still win South Carolina if he finishes at the top end of his forecast range.
Rick Santorum 538 forecast (most likely outcome): 14 percent High end of forecast range: 22 percent Low end of forecast range: 7 percent South Carolina has in some ways been frustrating for Mr. Santorum.
Jon M. Huntsman Jr. 538 forecast (most likely outcome): 4 percent High end of forecast range: 8 percent Low end of forecast range: 0 percent Mr. Huntsman abandoned Iowa long ago and has had little presence in the state.
Rick Santorum FiveThirtyEight forecast (most likely outcome): 27 percent High end of forecast range: 35 percent Low end of forecast range: 20 percent Arizona's somewhat libertarian-leaning politics are not the most natural fit for Mr. Santorum.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com