Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(55)
Both groups profited considerably from therapy and DCS did not significantly improve this outcome (p = 0.475; η2p = 0.01).
The score was a potent predictor of outcome (p = 0.0006).
The interaction of eptifibatide with CrCl had borderline significance for the 30-day outcome (p = 0.109).
RESULTS: Increasing patient age has a negative effect on visual outcome (P = 0.0179).
The total CMHS was only a marginally significant predictor of either outcome (p values < 0.06).
In similar models, heart rate reactivity was unrelated to outcome (P =.12).
Similar(5)
We obtained strong corelation of leukocytosis (p = 0.013) with DCI and poor outcome (p=0,016).
Rectal biopsies and pathology could not predict outcome (P=0.22).
Interestingly, fluoxetine alone was superior to nonblinded CBT alone even on this outcome (p=0.01).
Thirty-five subjects were estimated to be needed in each diet arm to achieve a significant outcome (P<0.05) with 80% power.
Chemotherapy to PC3-only animals dramatically reduced tumor sizes (59.2%, P<0.001), whereas anti-WNT16B did not further improve the outcome (P=0.18) (Figure 7b).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com