Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
A true-positive outcome occurred when the exploitable biomass had fallen below a reference point and this situation was signalled as out-of-control.
The primary outcome occurred in 75 of 1493 participants (5.0%) in the placebo group and 76 of 1493 (5.1%) in the acadesine group (odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.73-1.41]).
No amount of analysis would allow the long-distance carriers to predict those outcomes, and the correct course of action for example, the timing of investments in network infrastructure depended on which outcome occurred.
In Experiment 1, we found that predictive eye movements were elicited by both nonefficient and efficient actions, but anticipation of the outcome occurred much earlier in the efficient action condition.
Results Poor outcome occurred 54 % of included patients.
For all ADRs retained (n = 203), a fatal outcome occurred in 14 cases (7 % of ADRs).
This outcome occurred despite our making the recognition test difficult by using primary associates as lures.
The primary outcome occurred in 26 control patients (12.7%), as compared with 28 cases (13.7%).
The first coprimary outcome occurred in 43 patients receiving dronedarone and 19 receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 3.94; P=0.002).
Poor outcome occurred in 1 patient that was discharged at grade 3 mRS. Angiographic cure was achieved in 9 patients (42.9%).
We should note again that this outcome occurred even though we used deceptive lures (lures were primary associates of the target words) in Experiment 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com