Sentence examples for outcome comparisons with from inspiring English sources

For the main outcome, comparisons with p-value <= 0.05 were considered significant.

We recommend analysing all primary and secondary outcome comparisons with trial sequential analysis [ 25, 26, 47, 54] or another valid sequential method [ 25, 26, 53].

Median effect sizes ranged from -0.05 (Role Emotional) to 0.27 (Physical Component Summary), while the proportion of outcome comparisons with minimal-to-small differences (-0.49 to +0.49) ranged from 67% (Bodily Pain) to 93% (Role Emotional).

Patients' ratings of their satisfaction with treatment was significantly higher for ingenol mebutate than for vehicle for healing time, cosmetic outcome, comparison with patients' previous AK treatments, and overall satisfaction (all P < 0.001).

The purpose of this study was to summarize the available evidence about total lumbar disc replacement (TDR), focusing our attention on four main topics: clinical and functional outcomes, comparison with fusion surgery results, rate of complications and influence on sagittal balance.

Similar outcome comparisons for those with focal and multifocal clonic, focal tonic, and multifocal myoclonic seizures revealed no significant differences.

Likewise, 64%% of the examined clinical outcome comparisons demonstrated equal effectiveness with GS (38 of 59 clinical outcome comparisons) in maintenance therapy patients.

We showed that the number of elements employed by the VR technology, a crude indicator of interaction, was positively related with anxiety outcomes in comparisons with passive, but not active, treatments.

We estimated odds ratios for all outcomes and evaluated the concordance in the direction of effects between sleep and various types of pain and the correlation of treatment effects between sleep and pain outcomes.151 comparisons with 385 different trials met our eligibility criteria.

CRI scores are higher in patients with good outcome in comparison with patients with poor outcome and can be used to divide patients into three groups.

Investigating the importance of non-health outcomes in comparison with health outcomes and disentangling the existing relationships between the different possible non-health outcomes are interesting directions for further research in health promotion.