Sentence examples for outcome calculation from inspiring English sources

Eleven participants were protocol noncompliant, and two participants used non-study medications, which affected outcome calculation.

A sample adverse outcome calculation is available in the Supplemental Material (http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/9467/suppl.pdf).org/docs/2006/9467/suppl.pdf

Therefore including the larger group of beneficiaries in this outcome calculation might in some cases render such approaches attractive because it could be more cost-effective.

The outcome calculations were calculated as follows and the results are shown in Table 1: Patients with a positive (abnormal) screening LVEF result with Dox therapy and CHF: The probability distribution was considered to be zero, given the findings of Schwartz et al (1987) that CHF was not found in any of the patients with abnormal baseline LVEF whose care followed Schwartz's guidelines.

For comparisons between different healthcare settings, surveillance methods and outcome calculations should be standardized.

Hence, QoL at this time was not used for outcome calculations.

These 16 individuals were included in the outcome calculations due to the homogeneity of the interventions at the two sites.

One trial, previously present in the miscellaneous category, was excluded from our primary outcome calculations as its results were concerned with long-term retention, rather than immediate understanding [ 25].

In the outcome calculations, the continuous variables were analyzed in a mulivariate fashion using the analysis of covariance test, with adjustment for sex, smoking, age at baseline, and baseline value of the analyzed variable.

Seven trials reported loss to follow-up, ranging from 3% to 47% (table 2), which in all cases was dealt with by excluding lost participants from both the numerator and denominator for all outcome calculations.

To detect the same correlation coefficient (0.3) between a risk factor and outcome in a multiple regression model where all other variables in the model explained 30% of the total variation in outcome, calculations indicated that the sample size needed to be inflated by 40% [ 38].