Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
In ovaries between multiple and uniparous goats of follicular phase, 35 novel miRNAs were predicted in total, which is distinctly more than the amount predicted in our previous study (ovaries from pregnant and non-pregnant goats) implemented by our team workers, Zhang et al. [ 13].
Similar(59)
People that could not be contacted by our team worker were excluded from the study.
In another study conducted by our team, health workers described that interaction with immigrant patients is often difficult and provision of care generates feelings of work overload, anxiety and frustration [ 30], as also pointed out by other authors [ 20].
Moreover, although we find that wages underestimate the productivity loss due to absenteeism for team workers, our estimates indicate that wages are reasonable estimate of the productivity loss due to absenteeism for non-team workers.
The results are consistent with our hypothesis that the absence of team workers has a larger effect on firm-level production than wages in small firms.
Our estimates of the relative productivity and the relative wage of team workers versus non-team workers imply that team workers are more productive and earn more than non-team workers in the full sample (Tables 3 and 4).
Our findings highlight that the productivity loss due to absenteeism among team workers substantially exceeds the wage in small firms.
We subsequently relax these restrictions by assuming that absenteeism affects team workers and non-team workers differently, and then by estimating our model separately for small and large firms.
In Table 4, we relax our baseline specification by allowing the coefficient on the attendance rate to differ for team workers and non-team workers.
While team workers are more productive and earn higher wages than non-team workers, our findings further imply that their higher marginal productivity exceeds the wage premium they receive.
When we consider different absence rates for team workers and non-team workers, the coefficients do not change much, which suggests our main analyses are robust.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com